Skip to main content

Bing vs. Google



Bing vs. Google

You've heard it all before. It's the most overused axiom in any event where the underdog takes on the top dog: David versus Goliath. The underdog rarely has a chance and almost never pulls off the improbable upset. That's sort of the case with Bing. With Google as the top dog of search engines, no company outside of Yahoo has been able to muster much of a challenge. Search is Google's bread and butter. Microsoft, on the other hand, is much more diverse. But Google's single focus has rewarded it with the largest piece of the pie.
Microsoft's Windows Live Search was a search engine that went along with the company's other Live-brand-named products. Live Search wasn't a dedicated search, or in Bing's case, decision engine, and couldn't compete with Google. That's why Microsoft built Bing.
To compete with the Google juggernaut, Microsoft jazzed up the appearance of Bing by displaying a colorful, and sometimes dramatic, picture on its entire home page. The picture changes daily. This is in sharp contrast to Google's blank white page. Embedded in these images are what Microsoft refers to as "hotspots." When the user scrolls his or her mouse over one of these hotspots, information boxes pop up to tell you more about the photo. For instance, an image of Mt. Vesuvius contains several hotspots that when scrolled over, reveal information of its deadly eruption in AD 79. You can follow any of these links to learn more.
Both Bing and Google have the same tabs to filter searches as well as preference menus. You can choose from tabs labeled Web, video, images, shopping, news and maps, and you can also set your preferences to filter explicit content. Google's popularity is due in large part to the effectiveness of its powerful search algorithm and patented PageRank system. Bing attempts to counter this with its best match feature which, like PageRank, sorts the results by order of relevance. For instance, when you search "NASCAR" in Bing, the top result, or best match, is NASCAR.com, NASCAR's official Web site.
Below is a screenshot of how the two search engines handle the same inquiry. Notice the inquiry "how Bing works."
Perhaps Microsoft's boldest move -- the one that may have even raised eyebrows at Google was Microsoft's 10-year-long agreement to power Yahoo's search. Yahoo, in exchange, will throw its expertise behind advertising for both Yahoo and Bing search. Yahoo has the second-largest slice of the search pie at 20 percent. Combined with Microsoft's share, the new entity will have nearly half of what Google claims. Bing will take over Yahoo search in 2010. Over the first five years, Yahoo will receive 88 percent of advertising revenue. As part of the agreement, Microsoft is guaranteeing search revenue for 18 months in each country in which it operates [source: Fried].
Microsoft spent a reported $80 million in promoting Bing [source: McNichol]. Will it improve the company's market share? Over the long haul, it's anyone's guess, but in July 2009, shortly after Bing's release, Microsoft's piece of the pie increased to 10 percent of the search market [source Ngo].
Enjoy :)
Ahmad Bin Shafiq and Momin Ali

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Android vs. iOS

Android vs. iOS Google's Android and Apple's iOS are operating systems used primarily in mobile technology , such as smartphones and tablets. Android, which is Linux -based and partly open source, is more PC -like than iOS, in that its interface and basic features are generally more customizable from top to bottom. However, iOS' uniform design elements are sometimes seen as being more user-friendly. You should choose your smartphone and tablet systems carefully, as switching from iOS to Android or vice versa will require you to buy apps again in the Google Play or Apple App Store. Android is now the world’s most commonly used smartphone platform and is used by many different phone manufacturers. iOS is only used on Apple devices, such as the iPhone . Comparison chart

: T80 Core To Be The Most Precise 8080 To Date :

T80 Core To Be The Most Precise 8080 To Date 8080 Emulation Quality 8080 has many dark corners. Unlike its more popular successor Z80, 8080 had never been studied enough and most emulator code, and FPGA cores, relied on data from various books and often even word of mouth. Thusly, it's known that DAA instruction doesn't yield correct result after subtration but it's not known why and AC flag has mysterious ways too.. Just recently a few enthusiastic people from a Russian Vector-06c fans forum found a piece of software for Vector-06c which could not be started in any of the existing emulators, couldn't be started in my FPGA replica yet had no problem running in the real Vector-06c at all. After some investigation it turned out that 8080 ALU had AC flag inverted after SUB operation. This involves SUB, SBB, SBI, DCR, CMP, CPI instructions. The pesky ware used the contents of 8080 flags register as a branch address. Ultimately it led to this discovery of aux